Hey all,
I've been in the market for a couple weeks for a 9-5, prefarably in the 4k-6k range price wise. I've been looking at pricing and a bit of research, and frankly, the internet research is a bit confusing.
I don't see where there should be much difference in model years in reliability (especially 00-05) but yet consumer reports hammers the 2002 and 2003 (especially engine reliability), then 2004 shows pretty good reliability engine wise, then it goes downhill a bit again after 2004. Now the big problem to me is that they don't distinguish the Aero, which from my research is the same engine from 02-05. Initially I was intrested in the 2002 Aero line but now I'm scared, and looking at 2004 linears 2.3T which appears to be the same engine though from the 2002 linears.
Any comments from owners who have devoured the threads and have a better understanding on this?
Thanks!
I've been in the market for a couple weeks for a 9-5, prefarably in the 4k-6k range price wise. I've been looking at pricing and a bit of research, and frankly, the internet research is a bit confusing.
I don't see where there should be much difference in model years in reliability (especially 00-05) but yet consumer reports hammers the 2002 and 2003 (especially engine reliability), then 2004 shows pretty good reliability engine wise, then it goes downhill a bit again after 2004. Now the big problem to me is that they don't distinguish the Aero, which from my research is the same engine from 02-05. Initially I was intrested in the 2002 Aero line but now I'm scared, and looking at 2004 linears 2.3T which appears to be the same engine though from the 2002 linears.
Any comments from owners who have devoured the threads and have a better understanding on this?
Thanks!