SaabCentral Forums banner

Opinions Wanted on 1965 SAAB 96 Monte Carlo Value vs 1984 C900 Turbo

375 Views 3 Replies 2 Participants Last post by  Cornbinder89
10
It's been a LONG time, but I'm back, folks! I'm here to get some input on a couple options for classic SAABs I'm looking at. Although I usually don't like to do this, I'll probably cross-post this between this forum and the C900 forum. I appreciate your input, because I'm a little unplugged from current values and desirability. That's not the only reason I'm back into this, but it is a factor. ;) That said, here's the specimens I'm looking at:

It's a 1965 96 Monte Carlo, 4 speed, comes with spare parts. It's said to run great, have been garaged all its life, no rust, all that good stuff. I am currently verifying the odometer reading with the seller. I'm familiar enough with these to understand the unique challenges of owning and operating these. I'm sure parts can be a challenge as well. This is just going to be the car in storage, the car that goes out for a show or the occasional joy ride. It appears I'd be able to pick this up for $6,000 plus whatever it costs me to pick it up across state lines.

Car Wheel Tire Vehicle Land vehicle
Hood Automotive tire Motor vehicle Vehicle Automotive design


Vehicle Car Motor vehicle Steering part Automotive design


The other is a 1984 C900 Turbo, 5 speed, with about 67,000 on it. It's been gone over well, shifts well, but it does have some known issues. The temp gauge doesn't work and it's not sure where the fault is, has general oil leaks, said to struggle with cold starts on occasion, rear brake squeal that might be calipers, and a tired AC compressor. The other wear is on the inside, the usual dash cover stuff, leather seat wear, some exterior wear but nice overall. It does come with some spare parts and a Bentley manual. The original ask was a fair bit higher, but I'm under the impression that I should be able to get it for about the same price as the 96 above, between $5500 and $6500.

Tire Wheel Land vehicle Vehicle Car

Wheel Tire Automotive parking light Land vehicle Vehicle

Automotive fuel system Motor vehicle Automotive exterior Automotive air manifold Gas

Vehicle Car Motor vehicle Automotive design Car seat cover

Tire Wheel Automotive parking light Vehicle Car

Motor vehicle Vehicle Car Automotive design Steering wheel

Car Vehicle Gear shift Motor vehicle Steering wheel
See less See more
1 - 2 of 4 Posts
96 is way cool, but condition of a 50 year old car is a question. There are good 900's out there, there are very few 96's.
You can't really compare or say one is better than the other. They are too different. If you are buying as an investment, auto's are a very poor bet.
I have a 900, I would love to have a two stroke also, but the 900 is a useable car, a 96 would be a show and local car only
  • Like
Reactions: 1
I don't have that kind of coin to invest in a car that would be driven that little. I do only drive my 900 3 seasons, keeping off the road when sloppy. That said, if I did have the ability I sure would like to add a 2 stroke to the mix. The 900 is a more useable car, but if that isn't your deciding factor. if the 96 is in as good shape as you seam to think it is, as a collector car it gets my vote. You can still find 900's fairly easy, the same can't be said for the 96.
Car collecting in my book will never be about which ones will be worth more in the future, it is about enjoying them today, with an eye to keeping them around. They will never fund my retirement regardless.
1 - 2 of 4 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top