|
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Garage | Photo Gallery | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Auto Escrow | Auto Loans | Insurance |
| The Lounge For Saab related posts of a non-technical nature |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
9000 or 9-5
which one is better? or better yet, which one would you guys get? |
| Sponsored Links | ||
Advertisement | ||
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
You've opened a can of worms there mate.
__________________
mañana mañana |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
interestingly...
while the 9-3 is the 900 replacement and the 9-5 the 9000 replacement, I favor the 900's and 9-5's for some reason. guess that's my answer. . Last edited by honungsbi; 18-04-07 at 03:58 AM. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well with all due respect for the old folks on the forum, the 9-5 did replace the 9000, so its newer in every single way, and most car companies like to put out a better, more advanced product than the one before it, so I'd put my money on the 9-5
However I'm sure others will put in plenty of their own thoughts. Wasn't ther a thread on this a few weeks ago?
__________________
stay hungry, stay foolish - steve jobs |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
9000 = big comfortable barge
9-5 = big comfortable barge that goes around corners There's a lot to be said for the 9000 (cs) hatch but the 9-5's trunk is huge too. 9000 interior looks dated compared to the 9-5. 9-5's air con is way better than the 9000's. 9000 has a decent oil pump, the 9-5 has a problem with sludge if not maintained correctly. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Given the same age and milage
9000 every time as it is likely to last a good deal longer without needing to replace the engine Air con better ? in performance maybe ..in reliability huge difference the 9-5 sticky flap problem... the 9000 a/c is simple and reliable no dual zones but then again it works... Practicality ? 9-5 hatch every time for these impulse Ikea buying moments comfort ? 9000 seats are 10x better than the 9-5 ones Handling ? again the 9000 as the 9-5 eats rear shocks,the alignment goes out then you eat tyres they are both barge like but the 9-5 is definitely more wobblesome and the steering is very shaun the sheep (wooly) the 9-5 is quieter and more refined goes over speed bumps as of they are not there and it is probably marginally more economical but I would choose the 9000 every time For the record my current daily driver is a 9-5 (would swap it in a heartbeat for a 9000.....)
__________________
9000 aero stg 7 266k miles 500 hp six speed ! 9000 cs 2.0 stage 6 350 hp track slag 900 t16s classic 184k 9-3ss 2009 turboX sportwagon 69,000 miles |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
I own a 9 5 and my former car was a 9000. As for air con reliability, this is the very reason as to why I sold the 9000. The compressor failed utterly. I have been running the 9 5 (four and a half years old, 125.000 km when I got it) for one year now without a hitch. I think the 9 5 is over the 9000 in every aspect, mainly safety, except for the hatch, regardless that is the Aero and the 9000 was the CSE with an LPT.
This said, I still find my old car parked near my home sometimes and still look at it and think "Wow, what a car, she rode smoothly and flawlessly for miles and miles, and what a great look!". So, brains says 9 5. Heart says, well, maybe not...
__________________
Basic flying rules: Try to stay in the middle of the air. Do not go near the edges of it. The edges of the air can be recognised by the appearance of ground, buildings, sea and interstellar space. It is much more difficult to fly there. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Don't tell any of the other c900 guys, but I've always had a soft spot for the 9-5 Aero Estate. I can't explain this as I hate every other estate I've ever seen. If I had children I think I'd be driving one. As long as I could keep the 900, of course.
__________________
MMmmmmmm. Juicy Fruit. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Oh wait, look at the avatar!!
__________________
Anyone seen my Turbo Encabulator |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
i've had both. recently traded my 9000 CSE hatch for a 9-5 Arc wagon. i love both cars, but i have to say i think the 9-5 is much more refined. the 9000 seemed bigger.
if i found the right 9000 Aero, i'd probably pick it up.
__________________
2008 Acura MDX 2008 Saab 9-5 Aero Sedan 1981 Mercedes 380SLC |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
I still think the 9000 is better value - quick, comfortable and handles better than a C900 IMHO.
The 9-5 is a 'pleasant' cruiser but easily outhandled by an average Ford. I was unimpressed. Hate the dash too....that 'slab' looks incredibly dated. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
the car in Sport mode handles quite well and grips corners with great accuracy. steering feel is sharp and natural. transmission response in Sport is very quick (for an auto-box) and i think better than the Sentronic paddles on the wheel. i also think the interior ergonomics are much better than the 9k, but still maintain that natural Saab feel.
__________________
2008 Acura MDX 2008 Saab 9-5 Aero Sedan 1981 Mercedes 380SLC |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Depending on your budget, a late 9000 is IMHO a much better put together car than a 9.5 - especially the early ones. Ideally a 2.3fpt Anniversary or the Aero.
More reliable, more space, more comfort, more performance, more for your money. You just get a lot more... |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
If the offer was a late 9000 Aero or a early 2.0 LPT R reg 9-5 base model its a different decision. Try them both, see what fits you and your wallet
__________________
I decline to grant to SAABCENTRAL.COM a non exclusive, royalty free, worldwide, perpetual license to reproduce, distribute, transmit, sublicense, create derivative works of, publicly display, publish and perform any materials and other information I submit to any public areas.... |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
If you drive them both, you will invariably like one more. Try 'em out! When I was replacing my NG900 I took one test drive in a c900 and instantly fell in love
__________________
The faster you go, the more you see. |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
2005 9-5 Aero please!
|
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
We had a long hard look at 9-5's to replace the 9000cse; it would have to be a wagon to suite our lifestyle [saloon is about as much use as my 900 convertible for load lugging
I'll disagree with Ylee on the seats and ergonomics of the 9000, both of which I find dreadful in comparison to even an early new 900 [or a 1992 Vauxhall Cavalier SRi for that matter] but such things are subjective and you'll only know for sure once you get behind the wheel and go somewhere. Where we do concur on the 9000 is that they are indeed a tough old bus and a good one will last decades for sure. The 9-5 is a victim of its history; built on an already old chassis [thoroughbred Saab it is! 9000 offers: Relative simplicity Good car for peanuts Established longevity Hatchback option Big car comfort without the weight Available in ruby red and stunning deep purpley colour Easy tune T5 Manual V6 petrol 9-5 offers: Sublime ride Proper 5 seater [middle rear 3 point belt] Worlds safest car [according to Folksam] Extensively shared platform offers some cheap service parts Ignition switch in the correct place Estate option Diesel option Lots of funky toys in the latest versions Also, both offer excellent towing performance and as such have more of a caravan club image associated than a Volvo estate ..."Pass the Werthers, there's a good fellow."
__________________
1998 Saab 900se 2.0 Turbo Convertible 1999 Saab 9-5 se Waggon 2.0 Abbot Racing ecu 1997 Saab 9000 cse 2.3 stg 3 (mothballed 1997 Fiat Punto 1.25 85hp |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Get the 9-5. It's ignition is where it should be. Case closed.
__________________
I reject your reality, and substitute my own. - Adam Savage, Myth Busters My Car (flickr) |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ergonomics ?
I find myself looking for stuff in the 9-5 all the time the 9000 is just kinda right (less buttons maybe ?) but I definitely find the seats of my SE to be wofully inadequate in the side bolster department ,relatively ok in the strait and narrow but once you attack the twisties there is no side grip at all the 9000 (not the aero) I found to have the best seats of any car and if I could find a way of swapping the 9-5 seats for a set of 9000's I would The aero seats I found took some getting used to However these things are subjective (I for one cannot stand the c900 driving position... ok take me out and burn me as a heritic but ...) so we can agree to disagree here the 9-5 is very quiet tho ...probably one of the quietest cars I have driven
__________________
9000 aero stg 7 266k miles 500 hp six speed ! 9000 cs 2.0 stage 6 350 hp track slag 900 t16s classic 184k 9-3ss 2009 turboX sportwagon 69,000 miles |
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
2008 Acura MDX 2008 Saab 9-5 Aero Sedan 1981 Mercedes 380SLC |
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|