New intercooler idea!... Maby - SaabCentral Forums
* site search:  
Home Saab Pictures Saab Classifieds Saab Dealer Listings Saab Forum Saab Forum

Go Back   SaabCentral Forums > Saab Classic 900, 1979-1993 & '94 Convertible > Saab Classic 900 Performance, Mods & Tuning
Saab Classic 900 Performance, Mods & Tuning Covers Tuning & Performance modifications for the Classic Saab 900

SaabCentral.com is the premier Saab Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 26-01-04
henderd henderd is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004                                                
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 9
Default New intercooler idea!... Maby

I was checking out the new audi s3 and saw that it runs 2 small intercoolers at the two front corners of the car.
http://www.s-cars.org/s3/Gallery/S3_...allery_48.html

I think this will work in a 900 clasic turbo.
Has anyone seen this?
Has anyone given this some thought?
I think it will work with one modified (shortened) IC to turbo pipe running to the "new" stock 900IC placed in front of the battrey, a custome crossover pipe to the stock IC then in to the throttle body as usual. I think it will work.
I am in to the "junkyard" upgrades, as I am hardly employed now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #2  
Old 26-01-04
DeLorean DeLorean is offline
Saab Lunatic
 
Join Date: Jul 2002                                                
Location: Philadelphia PA USA<- 78 99T, 88 900 SPG
Posts: 2,164
Default

there are a lot of intercooler options out there, many more complex than others! What a lot of people here will tell you is to go with a Volvo 740 intercooler with the C-900. The Volvo intercooler is massive compared to the classic 900 intercooler, and it's front mount so it will get much more airflow as well... the reason my SPG does not have one is because in my opinion the pipe work required to install the unit hangs too low to the ground for a safety margin Something to think about may be to get a volvo intercooler and change the end caps to something that's custom. That should eliminate the problems with routing the intercooler pipe work. the dual IC idea is neat, but to my knowledge no one has ever tried it. For all out performance, you want an FMIC. it's simply the best way to go for maximum intercooling. Anyway, just posting a few ideas!


http://www.saabcentral.com/techhelp/...ic/default.htm

That's a link to Petes set up, but you know my problem with that :-? Still, there may be some way to make it work...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #3  
Old 26-01-04
henderd henderd is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004                                                
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 9
Default

Thanks for the input jeff.
I do not like the Volvo IC: too much front-end modd, susceptible to damage, plus lots of time. I think the extra thermal mass of a second IC would give my modest 15 psi of boost just what it needs (only 91 octane in Denver ). With two IC fans, some ducting in the front bumper, should give me more than twice the stock intercooling capacity.

David
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #4  
Old 27-01-04
Matthew's Avatar
Matthew Matthew is offline
Saab Mad
 
Join Date: Dec 2001                                                
Location: Gloucestershire, UK
My Saabs: 900 S Aero Turbo, 9-5 Aero
Posts: 14,069
Default

The Volvo IC flows only 200CFM due to its thin core and miniature channels. If you accept the rule that required airflow = BHP x 1.5, then the 200CFM Volvo is good for a shade under 134BHP.

The IC is unlikely to saturate due to its huge size, but it will strangle your engine's airflow IMO. This has the effect of making the turbocharger work harder than it has to, with consequent rise in EGT and intake charge temp.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #5  
Old 27-01-04
Janne Selinummi Janne Selinummi is offline
Saab Lunatic
 
Join Date: Jan 2002                                                
Location: Turku, Finland
Posts: 1,072
Default

It's also worth a note, that the standard I/C of the C900 is a bad design by flow standards as well. It will feature quite a lot of pressure drop when used under high boost, and two similar units connected would just make that worse. You would end up losing lots of the gained hp because of that pressure drop. I wouldn't go for a Volvo I/C nor a 9000 I/C, since all they are in the end, are just standard OE parts with poor flow. Get a thicker, better flowing core from a truck, for example, and have some smoothly-shaped alloy end tanks made. Then fit the thing in front of the radiator, and you will have real intercooling!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #6  
Old 27-01-04
Matthew's Avatar
Matthew Matthew is offline
Saab Mad
 
Join Date: Dec 2001                                                
Location: Gloucestershire, UK
My Saabs: 900 S Aero Turbo, 9-5 Aero
Posts: 14,069
Default

The C900 IC as a complete unit is a poorly performing intercooler. However, this IMO isn't due to bad core design but it because of the location, forced airflow U-turn and the small core size.

Forget for a moment all the above factors which compromise the intercooler's performance.

If you analyse cross-sectional area of the channels on a late-model core, they're really quite a good size. In fact, it's a better design IMO than some aftermarket ICs (Pace springs to mind).

If the C900 core was three times the size, with alloy end-tanks and top-to-bottom airflow, you'd have a very capable IC: excellent airflow, significant thermal mass and short channel lengths.

All IMHO of course
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #7  
Old 27-01-04
tandino tandino is offline
Saab Lunatic
 
Join Date: Sep 2001                                                
Location: Td04 T16S, 89 35k mile 1 owner 2 dr T16S
Posts: 1,587
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matthew
The Volvo IC flows only 200CFM due to its thin core and miniature channels
This test (Autospeed) wasnt a conclusive 'flow bench' test iirc,
Afaic there is no definative cfm test for the Volvo i/c,
Agreed the Volvo i/c is not the best flowing i/c out there but for its chargecooling ability it does a good job for little money,
Throttle response in my car subjectively did not change when installing the Volvo from the stock C900 i/c...
Iirc the tests i have seen highlighted the Volvo i/c was more efficient than the Saab 9000 i/c and there are plenty of 9000's running around producing 300+bhp on the stock i/c.
I also cant see Volvo installing a i/c rated at &lt;134bhp on a car which as standard produced 180+bhp - Volvo have been in the turbo game as long/longer than Saab in terms of HGV's so i doubt they would overlook this simple calculation....

Pete.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #8  
Old 27-01-04
mattfaulks mattfaulks is offline
SaabNut!
 
Join Date: Jul 2002                                                
Location: Hinckley, Current: 9-5 2.3T aka F/R 5, Ex - F900, F9000
Posts: 328
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matthew
If the C900 core was three times the size, with alloy end-tanks and top-to-bottom airflow, you'd have a very capable IC: excellent airflow, significant thermal mass and short channel lengths.

All IMHO of course
Shall I get the TIG welder out?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #9  
Old 27-01-04
Alex's Avatar
Alex Alex is offline
Saab Lunatic
 
Join Date: Aug 2001                                                
Location: Crossing the England/Wales border
My Saabs: 3dr c900 T16RA, 9-5 Aero Estate
Posts: 4,666
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tandino
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matthew
The Volvo IC flows only 200CFM due to its thin core and miniature channels
This test (Autospeed) wasnt a conclusive 'flow bench' test iirc,
Afaic there is no definative cfm test for the Volvo i/c,
Agreed the Volvo i/c is not the best flowing i/c out there but for its chargecooling ability it does a good job for little money,
Throttle response in my car subjectively did not change when installing the Volvo from the stock C900 i/c...
Iirc the tests i have seen highlighted the Volvo i/c was more efficient than the Saab 9000 i/c and there are plenty of 9000's running around producing 300+bhp on the stock i/c.
I also cant see Volvo installing a i/c rated at &lt;134bhp on a car which as standard produced 180+bhp - Volvo have been in the turbo game as long/longer than Saab in terms of HGV's so i doubt they would overlook this simple calculation....

Pete.
The Autospeed test was a good comparative test, its the shame that the Saab IC wasn't tested at the same time (infact the original wording on the Autospeed test was Saab/Volvo as they weren't sure which car the IC came from) as the 'leaf blower' test didn't really flow enough air to be representative.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #10  
Old 27-01-04
uberfast's Avatar
uberfast uberfast is offline
Saab Crazy
 
Join Date: Sep 2003                                                
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
My Saabs: 1986 Saab 900 16v Turbo
Posts: 510
Default

Yeah I thought about creting a setup useing two c900 8v turbo ic's... the alloy ones. Using an airflow bumper would help out the most py proving a good amoutn of both room for two seperate ic's and to flow a good amount of air to each ic. I'll have to draw a diagram some time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #11  
Old 27-01-04
Widde's Avatar
Widde Widde is offline
Saab Crazy
 
Join Date: Sep 2002                                                
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
My Saabs: 88 900 aero, 02 9-3 aero, 97 900t cab
Posts: 569
Default

I've got my two stock 900ic at my local welder right now . Two are becoming one (crossflow ofcourse :wink: )
The welder has time until march until it needs to be done so it might be awhile until pictures and data will be avaible.

first sketch (pipes will be 2.5" in the finished IC)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #12  
Old 27-01-04
Janne Selinummi Janne Selinummi is offline
Saab Lunatic
 
Join Date: Jan 2002                                                
Location: Turku, Finland
Posts: 1,072
Default

What about turning the core so that the tubes would be vertical? Then take the inlet-outlet pipes from the ends of the end tanks - this would make for an ideal shape, according to Corky Bell, and it would result in better flow and more even cooling... Just an idea!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #13  
Old 27-01-04
ejenner's Avatar
ejenner ejenner is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2003                                                
Location: www.saabsforum.com
My Saabs: 900 Carlsson, 99t, 99 T16, 900 t16 vert
Posts: 7,270
Default

How does the Abbott chargecooler system fit in here?

Just read the entire thread - (since getting into Saabs) - I only know that intercoolers are important but have heard so much info on different options that there does not appear a to be a device or setup that really stands out.

Obviously Abbotts talk-up they're own system - not always best to go with what you read on commercial sites though!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #14  
Old 27-01-04
Matthew's Avatar
Matthew Matthew is offline
Saab Mad
 
Join Date: Dec 2001                                                
Location: Gloucestershire, UK
My Saabs: 900 S Aero Turbo, 9-5 Aero
Posts: 14,069
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ejenner
How does the Abbott chargecooler system fit in here?
There was a bit of discussion on the Abbott chargecooler in this thread:
http://www.saabcentral.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=11198
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #15  
Old 27-01-04
ejenner's Avatar
ejenner ejenner is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2003                                                
Location: www.saabsforum.com
My Saabs: 900 Carlsson, 99t, 99 T16, 900 t16 vert
Posts: 7,270
Default

That's all quite interesting - RE: Abbott chargecooler thread.

Someone was saying the Abbott setup was 140cfm - this post says the volvo unit is 206cfm - if I remember right.

Volvo unit is the obvious way to go - ??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #16  
Old 27-01-04
Alex's Avatar
Alex Alex is offline
Saab Lunatic
 
Join Date: Aug 2001                                                
Location: Crossing the England/Wales border
My Saabs: 3dr c900 T16RA, 9-5 Aero Estate
Posts: 4,666
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ejenner
That's all quite interesting - RE: Abbott chargecooler thread.

Someone was saying the Abbott setup was 140cfm - this post says the volvo unit is 206cfm - if I remember right.

Volvo unit is the obvious way to go - ??
The cfm figures do depend on what test circumstances are used. There is no mention of inlet pressure at all for the Abbott figures and their cfm for the standard c900 IC is only enough for 65bhp!

The Autospeed figures are relative against the other ICs in the test, not absolute values.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #17  
Old 28-01-04
boxman's Avatar
boxman boxman is offline
Saab on the Brain!
 
Join Date: Nov 2003                                                
Location: south west_UK
My Saabs: 9-3 SS Aero TTiD + 9-3 SV Aero
Posts: 7,970
Default

i thought of doing this on a 99 that i fitted a t16 to but
a) there wasnt room
b) i decided that there would be too much heat soak from the turbo its self therefor heating the charge air not cooling it as planned
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Bookmarks

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the SaabCentral Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:44 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

top of page | sitemap | email us



copyright © 2003 - 2011 saabcentral.com, All rights reserved http://www.whiter.co.uk - valid xhtml - valid css
SaabCentral is an independently run website and is not affiliated in any way to Saab Automobile AB.


Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.