|
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Garage | Photo Gallery | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Auto Escrow | Auto Loans | Insurance |
| The Lounge For Saab related posts of a non-technical nature |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I just got back from New York to take car of the rest of the apartment stuff (moving in two weeks!) and my rental car was a Chevy Cobalt sport coupe with 17" wheels, like the one shown below.
![]() This is the worst car I have ever driven on the snow/ice. It could have just been the tires (17" Pirelli P6's) but it would under steer like crazy. I just couldn't get over how bad this car was in the snow. It wouldn't even move with the traction control on. It made the drive from NYC to Newburgh rather scary, I needed my Saab. I just can't think of a worse car I have seen in the snow. I'm pretty sure my friends 1972 SS Chevelle is better on the snow than the Cobalt. |
| Sponsored Links | ||
Advertisement | ||
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Did it have snow tires?
__________________
*SAABCentral NEW ENGLAND CREW Member 008* (now in NC) T5Suite2.0 Stage 3+, Full DIY 3" exhaust w/Magnaflow, Spec stage 2+ clutch, "Custom" airbox mod, Forge BPV, DIY strut brace, Poly bushings, various powder-coated goodies |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
17 inch Pirelli P6 there is your answer
Put 14 inch wheels with 175/75 tires or even 15 inch wheels with 185/65, snow tires, boom that thing will go anywhere... 17 inch wheels, wide tires, summer tires and a small light car it will just do nothing
__________________
Turbo allows the valiant who has appeared at the wheel SAAB to gain momentum for 200 km/h Charm SAAB Turbo also that it to you not bad Porsche on it it is possible with speed of pregnant turtle feeling itself in full comfort which by the way our hero obeys a rudder reliably and confidently the truth management hardly will twirl a steering wheel by one finger uneasy. Without the hydraulic booster quickly enough perishes a steering shaft, but to change its hemorrhoids from the most fierce |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I guess the real answer is don't get a rental car from Budget at LaGuardia. It also had just straight water in the windshield wiper fluid reservoir, which of course froze.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Worst winter car will be the one with pretend high performance summer tyres fitted. When it comes to tyres it really is horse for course.
__________________
1998 Saab 900se 2.0 Turbo Convertible 1999 Saab 9-5 se Waggon 2.0 Abbot Racing ecu 1997 Saab 9000 cse 2.3 stg 3 (mothballed 1997 Fiat Punto 1.25 85hp |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I don't speak tire.
__________________
*SAABCentral NEW ENGLAND CREW Member 008* (now in NC) T5Suite2.0 Stage 3+, Full DIY 3" exhaust w/Magnaflow, Spec stage 2+ clutch, "Custom" airbox mod, Forge BPV, DIY strut brace, Poly bushings, various powder-coated goodies |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
My 1984 Subaru Standard base model front wheel drive hatchback was the worst car I have ever tried to drive in the snow. I say tried to drive, because it really didn't work. This thing would get stuck in the rain. Seriously.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Any motor vehicle with one wheel drive and an oversized engine powering the lightly loaded rear wheels..
I think that any front driver( with one wheel drive) running on 4 doughnut spares would be better...
__________________
The earthworm '96 900S, Automatic Those who think in the past will have no future. 173K miles in the good ole USA Last edited by earthworm; 24-12-08 at 11:27 PM. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Like driving an aluminum flying saucer down a steep mountain. Actually the flying saucer has more control. I had this for 2 years before my Dodge Neon.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
By the true rental car standard, it likely had partly bald all-seasons
__________________
My posts are intended for community use only. I do not permit Saabcentral.com, any affiliate or anyone else to commercially use, charge for, or in any other way profit from any of my posts or linked images without my express written consent. In all cases I remain the sole owner of any content originated by me which I have posted on this, or any other site. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Like one of the other posters pointed out...
A vintage rear wheel drive car that doesn't have positrac and has wide ***** tires. |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
My 1974 AMX was quite the handful in the snow. I recall trying to get to a gas station about 5 blocks from home back in November of 1976. Went sideways most of the way. I slid my way home, parked in the garage, and bought a Jeep Wagoneer the next day. The AMX hasn't seen snow since. My Saab is GREAT in the snow.
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
There are a number of factors that determine of a car is good in the snow.
Drive wheels: Generally RWD is the worst. Most people falsely assume that AWD is the best. AWD would be the best if you could add AWD without the weight penalty, but the added weight that comes along with AWD leads to longer stopping distances. Since some car makers try to offset the added weight of AWD by usiong lighter weight materials in AWD models, lets define it as this: All else being equal AWD is better than FWD in the snow. AWD also has some risks in the snow: It masks the road conditions from the driver. If you don't slip at all when starting (like with AWD) you can be led to believe the roads arent that slippery, and be in for a HUGE surprise when its time to turn or stop. Weight I have often heard from people that heavy vehicles are better in the snow because they cut through the snow better. Nothing could be more wrong. Weight and the resulting inertia is a huge penalty in winter driving, as you get much longer stopping distances, more intertia to run (to prevent under steering) and more intertia when trying to get started from a standstill. A good winter car is as light as possible, with one caveat. In order to cut through the snow it should have as narrow tires as possible. This is what the "weight is good crowd" are mistaking for a weight benefit. Instead of more weight what you want is a greater weight to surface area ratio, without raising the overall weight of the vehicle. Tires In addition to the above (making your winter tires narrower than your summer ones) it also pays to have a good set of winter tires. All seasons simply won't do. In the past studded was always the way to go, but that is no longer the case with the latest generation of non-studded snow tires. Studded are better in some situations (usually shiny ice) and non-studded are better at others (slush and snow mixes). Choose a set depending on what you are most likely to see on roads around you. Other There are other factors too (like wight balance) that make a car more or less maneuverable in the snow. A car with a very slight under steer is to be preferred in the snow, as fishtailing all the time gets tiresome. Summary To sum it all up the best winter car will be lightweight with narrow winter tires, well balanced with slight understeer and FWD (or AWD if there is no weight penalty). The worst winter car will be the opposite. Heavy, wide tires, poorly balanced and RWD. (RWD pickup truck with performance tires maybe? All the weight is in the front of these...) Based on this I think a F150 Lightening is a prime contender for the absolutely worst winter vehicle (among reasonably modern cars) of them all
__________________
My posts are intended for community use only. I do not permit Saabcentral.com, any affiliate or anyone else to commercially use, charge for, or in any other way profit from any of my posts or linked images without my express written consent. In all cases I remain the sole owner of any content originated by me which I have posted on this, or any other site. Last edited by Mattlach; 24-12-08 at 10:44 PM. |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
I used to have one of these with a 4-speed manual. Not a very good choice in Michigan winters. Five-point-ooooooooooohhhh sh%$
|
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
But the Posi-traction will make all the difference. But, now, finally for the FWD there is the Quaffe.... And "I think, NOT I thing"... This is an error that spell check misses.
__________________
The earthworm '96 900S, Automatic Those who think in the past will have no future. 173K miles in the good ole USA |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Old mercedes saloons ('80s 300 SD, etc) are heavy, RWD, and oversteer-biased. With all-season tires, they are no picnic in the white stuff...
__________________
'83 900T8 150k, RIP (fire); '88 900T16, 180k, RIP (rust); '92 900 N/A 2.1, 269k (sold); '95 9000CSE, 205k (sold); '06 Toy Taco 4WD Long bed; '13 Ford Focus ST |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
FIAT 500 Jolly.......
|
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Turbo allows the valiant who has appeared at the wheel SAAB to gain momentum for 200 km/h Charm SAAB Turbo also that it to you not bad Porsche on it it is possible with speed of pregnant turtle feeling itself in full comfort which by the way our hero obeys a rudder reliably and confidently the truth management hardly will twirl a steering wheel by one finger uneasy. Without the hydraulic booster quickly enough perishes a steering shaft, but to change its hemorrhoids from the most fierce |
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
I had to drive my friends C55 AMG this past Sunday when we really got a big snow storm.
This thing, is by far the worst, SCARIEST thing I have ever driven on snow. Even though it's equipped with winter tires (performance winter), this thing is a disaster waiting to happen. I was on the left lane with a huge truck in the middle lane right next to me and he was too close to me for my comfort, so I decided to tap (and I mean the slightest of taps) the pedal and the thing almost spun out. It scared the crap out of me. |
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|