|
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Garage | Photo Gallery | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Auto Escrow | Auto Loans | Insurance |
| Saabs News For any Saab news from anywhere! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
August 1, 2007 Wednesday 6:49 AM EST
SECTION: AUTOS LENGTH: 616 words HEADLINE: Luxury car, crummy bumper BYLINE: By Peter Valdes-Dapena, CNNMoney.com staff writer In tests designed to replicate low-speed impacts, the bumpers of several luxury cars failed to prevent costly damage. In one case, a Mercedes-Benz C-class sedan sustained almost $5,500 in damage when hit in its front bumper at a speed of just 6 miles per hour. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety conducted four separate low-speed impact tests on 11 popular luxury cars. The cars struck a barrier, designed to mimic the bumper of another car, straight-on from the front and from the rear at six miles per hour and diagonally into front and rear corners at three miles per hour. The Institute, a private organization funded by insurance companies, estimated repair costs after each test. "[W]hat the test results don't reflect is the Mercedes-Benz holistic approach to occupant safety," Mercedes-Benz said in a statement. "This philosophy influences design and development even down to the front bumper, which is specifically mounted lower to help reduce injury for impacts with pedestrians (to avoid contact above the knee)." The C-class performed poorly in large part because its front bumper slid down below the impact barrier during the test. The vehicle sustaining the most total damage was the Infiniti G35, made by Nissan, which had total estimated repair costs of $14,000. In the straight-on front impact test alone, the G35 sustained $5,223 in damage. "The cost of vehicle ownership and repair are important considerations at Infiniti," Nissan said in a statement. "We design each new model to resist low-speed collision damage and will continue to work closely with major insurance companies to keep premiums low for our customers." The Insurance Institute's tests do not reflect likely real-world results, Nissan said. The best-performing vehicle in the test was the Saab 9-3. Its total estimated repair costs for all four tests was $5,243, less than what the Mercedes-Benz would have cost to fix after just one front impact. Found: http://insurancenewsnet.com/article....c&q=0&id=83061 |
| Sponsored Links | ||
Advertisement | ||
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
And had it been a pre SS, 9-3 SE the cost would have been Zero... |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
No, what I am saying is that the pre 2003 9-3 had good tough bumpers and not hollow painted plastic as now..
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
They did state in the story that the new 9-3SS was worse then the outgoing generation.
God help the Infiniti G35 driver who has to pay out a stagerring $14,000 in parking lot damages. Yikes The sad part of the whole story is that they normalized the results using a 1982 Ford Escort(US Version) under the exact same conditions. Total repair cost after 4 hits was $82.
__________________
"There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened." -- Douglas Adams |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
The Escort has spring loaded bumbers.
__________________
sudo chown -R us ./base |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wouldn't have cost a dime in my 1980 900T
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|